<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Oakville make power plant get municipal air permit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://envirolaw.com/oakville-air-bylaw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://envirolaw.com/oakville-air-bylaw/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=oakville-air-bylaw</link>
	<description>News and analysis (not advice) by a top Ontario environmental lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall Goodwin</title>
		<link>http://envirolaw.com/oakville-air-bylaw/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Goodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://envirolaw.com/?p=2506#comment-952</guid>
		<description>Oh the irony the irony....we finally close the Lakeview dinosaur and the much better replacement is branded a polluter.  The problems with this bylaw are too numerous to list.  Anyone who knows anything about air emissions understands that it is faulty in so many ways; unfortunately the Town councillors are not well enough informed on the subject to understand the problems with it.  As far as they are concerned, it&#039;s a bylaw to improve air quality (which it will not accomplish), and how could they possibly vote against a bylaw that is to improve air quality when all the residents are all stirred up about it.  To top it off, they think they are pioneers who will stir the pot at the province and force them to do something about it - like the pesticide issue.  I am all for improving air quality, but this bylaw will not do it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh the irony the irony&#8230;.we finally close the Lakeview dinosaur and the much better replacement is branded a polluter.  The problems with this bylaw are too numerous to list.  Anyone who knows anything about air emissions understands that it is faulty in so many ways; unfortunately the Town councillors are not well enough informed on the subject to understand the problems with it.  As far as they are concerned, it&#039;s a bylaw to improve air quality (which it will not accomplish), and how could they possibly vote against a bylaw that is to improve air quality when all the residents are all stirred up about it.  To top it off, they think they are pioneers who will stir the pot at the province and force them to do something about it &#8211; like the pesticide issue.  I am all for improving air quality, but this bylaw will not do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Oakville make power plant get municipal air permit? &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</title>
		<link>http://envirolaw.com/oakville-air-bylaw/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Oakville make power plant get municipal air permit? &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://envirolaw.com/?p=2506#comment-951</guid>
		<description>[...] the original here: Can Oakville make power plant get municipal air permit?   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original here: Can Oakville make power plant get municipal air permit?   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EcoBear</title>
		<link>http://envirolaw.com/oakville-air-bylaw/comment-page-1/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>EcoBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://envirolaw.com/?p=2506#comment-948</guid>
		<description>In 2007, pursuant to a Canada-wide Agreement managed through the CCME, each province was to have submitted a 5-year report of its progress toward meeting a national standard for PM10 and Ozone. Ontario did not submit a report.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2007, pursuant to a Canada-wide Agreement managed through the CCME, each province was to have submitted a 5-year report of its progress toward meeting a national standard for PM10 and Ozone. Ontario did not submit a report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://envirolaw.com/oakville-air-bylaw/comment-page-1/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://envirolaw.com/?p=2506#comment-945</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by LawyerNexus: Can Oakville make power plant get municipal air permit?: Can municipalities insist that local industries obtain mu... http://bit.ly/9P0NK9...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by LawyerNexus: Can Oakville make power plant get municipal air permit?: Can municipalities insist that local industries obtain mu&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/9P0NK9.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9P0NK9..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Gage</title>
		<link>http://envirolaw.com/oakville-air-bylaw/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Gage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://envirolaw.com/?p=2506#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Interesting to hear about Oakville&#039;s efforts.  Anyone looking for a BC perspective may want to check out: &lt;a href=&quot;http://wcel.org/resources/environmental-law-alert/local-governments-and-clean-air&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://wcel.org/resources/environmental-law-alert...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to hear about Oakville&#039;s efforts.  Anyone looking for a BC perspective may want to check out: <a href="http://wcel.org/resources/environmental-law-alert/local-governments-and-clean-air" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://wcel.org/resources/environmental-law-alert&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: envirolaw.com @ 2012-02-08 23:09:05 -->
