<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New rules on moving soil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://envirolaw.com/rules-moving-soil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://envirolaw.com/rules-moving-soil/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rules-moving-soil</link>
	<description>News and analysis (not advice) by a top Ontario environmental lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:34:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: DSS</title>
		<link>http://envirolaw.com/rules-moving-soil/comment-page-1/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>DSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://envirolaw.com/?p=2318#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>You are most welcome!Dianne Saxe </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are most welcome!Dianne Saxe </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward P Henderson</title>
		<link>http://envirolaw.com/rules-moving-soil/comment-page-1/#comment-1157</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward P Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://envirolaw.com/?p=2318#comment-1157</guid>
		<description>Finally something understandable on a very complicated matter.! thanks </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally something understandable on a very complicated matter.! thanks </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. George Duncan</title>
		<link>http://envirolaw.com/rules-moving-soil/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. George Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://envirolaw.com/?p=2318#comment-980</guid>
		<description>The problem in proving that soils brought on site are &quot;clean&quot; will very much depend on how &quot;representative&quot; the samples are that are collected for analysis and this is not an easy problem to solve.   The current legislation pays only lip-service to this issue and site cleanup decisions for hundreds of tons of soil are being made on the basis of a teaspoonful of dirt analysed at the laboratory.  Contaminated soils more often than not are simply too varied in composition to permit this simplistic approach and the new, lower limits in Reg 511/09 will only compound the problem. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem in proving that soils brought on site are &quot;clean&quot; will very much depend on how &quot;representative&quot; the samples are that are collected for analysis and this is not an easy problem to solve.   The current legislation pays only lip-service to this issue and site cleanup decisions for hundreds of tons of soil are being made on the basis of a teaspoonful of dirt analysed at the laboratory.  Contaminated soils more often than not are simply too varied in composition to permit this simplistic approach and the new, lower limits in Reg 511/09 will only compound the problem. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: envirolaw.com @ 2012-05-22 08:07:55 -->
